Ray Nagin's Speech: Effective or Ineffective leadership

Introduction: After the incident of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the American Gulf, the mayor of refreshing siege of Orleans glow Nagin was questioned and criticized by umpteen whether he was an telling draw or not and whether he dealt with the emergency successfully or not. Many of his raft byword that Nagins speech was an example of an effective leadership while others didnt acquiesce with that and refused the way he dealt with the agency as a totally. In this paper, I disagree with either the people that said: Ray Nagin was an effective leader. My opinion was in the main based on the analysis of his personal traits that I perceive from his interview in the context of our book. Analysis: In chapter 1, Selznick said that the leaders function is to secernate the ends of group existence, to design an enterprise distinctively adapted to these ends, and to oblige in line that the design becomes a living humans. Also, studying the potence of a leader, more emphas is should be displace on the egresscomes of the total system, including the fulfillment of expectations held by followers. In the lesson of Katrina, Nagin failed to cleave control of the situation. He didnt succeed in share his people and evacuating them when he was given the 2 days notice.

In chapter 3, Stogdill identified fewer personal traits that a leader should possess. I believe Nagin lacked few of these traits. He didnt have enough force to deal with the whole situation. The incident was difficult on everybody out there, but as a leader on behalf of New Orleans, he was not able to digest control of things horizontal on himself. He did not use his verbal quickness in the decorous manner. He used improper phrase al! l along the speech. He also lacked knowledge of things associate to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay